Skip to main content

An invitation for economics educators.

“Pareto Optimality” is the “virtue” upheld by economists that positions growth as the only salve for material suffering. “Methodological individualism” is the lens that positions individual productivity as the only method to arrive at growth.

And now we can tell ourselves these lies:
I - It is my responsibility to sacrifice my well being such that others might have enough 
(it is necessary that my life be unsustainable)
II - If I have enough — or an excess — it is because I have earned it. 
(a sustainable existence is only justified by earning it through a system known to be racist, sexist, ablest, classist, etc. but believed to be meritocratic)
III - Our economy must grow to guarantee there is enough, but if the impoverished don’t capture the spoils of the growth, the fault is their own.

Our teachings help our students believe that they are only worth of the necessities of life if they can afford them … and that they must sacrifice the few remaining uncommodified necessities (relationships, rest, spirituality, etc.) to afford the others.
our teachings are not based in fact.

do you know what its like to offer information you believe?

What do we do this for?
Indoctrination? 
Assimilation? 
Yes, a little.
We want our students to speak the language. “learn the intuition”

what else?

can you honor your own inquisitiveness, discernment? 
can you give yourself the gift of speaking truth? 
or perhaps rigorous scholarship?

can you honor their wisdom. can you honor their existing relationships to productivity, trade offs, government failures? Can you test your assumptions against their experience?

Let us be honest. Let us be relevant.
Let us be helpful. Let us be patient.
Let us be rigorous, not demanding.
Let us be cooperative, not pedantic.
Let us invite movement and growth where we cannot see it ourselves.
Let us not enforce stability at the cost of stagnation.
May we facilitate our students’ understanding of what is and what is possible.

------------

Day 26 #pandowrimo @adriennemareebrown What are you courageous enough to stop normalizing? - inspired by @sonyareneetaylor 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Long Blocks

The distance between school and the subway stop is three long blocks. Three blocks is not very far to walk, but three long blocks stretch into an eternity. Three short blocks would be one thing, but, as far as i'm concerned, the difference between a long block and a short block is approximately half an hour. Over the course of three short blocks, one can only think something like "should i get cigarettes? yes. no. yes. no. well now i've passed the tobacco shop and now i'm at school." Over the course of three long blocks, by contrast, one has time to contemplate the very meaning of a cigarette. What does it mean if i smoke a cigarette now? Is it different if i buy a pack or bum one? Is it different if i bum one from a friend or a stranger? If i offer some money in exchange? Do i even want this cigarette in the first place? Why? Does it have something to do with a general fear of success or a fear of failure? Is it self-sabotage or escape that embodies itself in t
2 comments
Read more

On My PGPs (they/them/their)

In some of my friend groups, asking for a new acquaintance's PGPs is commonplace on first encounter -- checking in about PGPs periodically, too. In most other friend groups, "preferred gender pronouns (PGPs)" are a completely strange concept. Given the first group of friends, I am frequently stunned when I meet someone who has never heard of PGPs. Put on the spot, as I often am, I've been giving a lot of impromptu explanations.   I've been refining my brief description: "Acknowledging preferred gender pronouns is important because gender identity is not a visible quality and we should work to speak authentically with and about one another. When someone refers to me as "she" they are not referring to me but of their own preconceived notion of who I am."   I've been automating my grammar response: "We already use 'they' to refer to one person of indeterminate gender. For example, A: 'my friend will meet us at the
Post a Comment
Read more

Eulogy for Rusty Sharpe

Rush Limbaugh is a relative of mine. A very, very distant relative. I have never spoken to him and I am certain as I can be that he didn't know I exist. I only know we are related because my great uncle is a historian of "pioneer" history which includes our family. Anyway, I remember learning that he was my grandpa's third cousin (or something like that) as a kid and -- knowing only that he was some measure of "successful" -- being sincerely appalled that he wasn't doing anything to help me and my cousins pay for college. ba dum ba. For reasons I don't entirely understand, I feel compelled to claim him. I have no interest in denying or downplaying the very real harm he willfully ignited or his commitment to moral decrepitude. But I very genuinely hope he finds peace. May you rest May your heart break open May your fear become ridiculous to you May the hatred you gripped tightly now slip through your fingers May your deceptions become heavy to those w
Post a Comment
Read more